In the previous part of this two-part series, we discussed five special considerations that should be contemplated by emerging medical marijuana companies and their investors. In this post, we will cover the remaining five risk factors that should be disclosed in the company’s private offering materials, which consist of the following:
6. Civil Forfeiture. Federal and state agencies may bring civil forfeiture proceedings in addition to, or in lieu of, bringing criminal prosecutions, which can result in property associated with a crime being confiscated or otherwise divested from the owner and forfeited to the government. This civil penalty could potentially reach all property associated with the medical marijuana company.
7. Potential for Unenforceable Contracts. A medical marijuana company may enter into contracts with persons in other states, and such contracts may be governed by non-Ohio law. Because marijuana is illegal under federal law and certain state laws, some state or federal courts may take the position that such contracts involving medical marijuana companies are unenforceable because they concern an illegal product or activity. It is advisable to consult with an attorney experienced in these matters to avoid the possibility of entering into an unenforceable contract.
8. No Federal Bankruptcy Protection. Federal bankruptcy courts have declined to entertain cases involving marijuana companies.[1] Therefore, an Ohio medical marijuana company looking to restructure will not be afforded federal bankruptcy protection, and will instead likely rely on an untested application of the Ohio receivership statute.
9. Potential FDA Regulation. To this point we have been discussing various legal obstacles derived from marijuana being illegal under federal law. However, if the federal government legalizes medical marijuana, the industry is then likely to see a substantial increase in regulation, including by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”). The FDA may issue rules and regulations requiring clinical trials or other hurdles to verify the efficacy and safety of the medical marijuana. It is also possible that the FDA would require facilities where medical marijuana is cultivated to be registered with the applicable governmental agencies.
10. Opposition From Pharmaceutical Companies. A medical marijuana company could face substantial threats from the pharmaceutical industry if medical marijuana displaces other drugs or encroaches on other pharmaceutical companies’ products. The pharmaceutical industry is well-funded with a strong and experienced lobby that is capable of imposing substantial marketing and political pressure on the medical marijuana industry.
If you would like to discuss these considerations in regards to your business, please contact Chris Brinkman at cbrinkman@kmklaw.com, Mark Reuter at fmreuter@kmklaw.com, or Allie Westfall at awestfall@kmklaw.com.
[1] See, e.g., In re Aranas, 535 B.R. 45 (BAP 10th Cir. 2015).
Possession and distribution of marijuana for any purpose is illegal under federal law. KMK can only advise clients regarding compliance with Ohio state law on medical cannabis, specifically, Sub H.B. 523 of the 131st General Assembly.
KMK Law articles and blog posts are intended to bring attention to developments in the law and are not intended as legal advice for any particular client or any particular situation. The laws/regulations and interpretations thereof are evolving and subject to change. Although we will attempt to update articles/blog posts for material changes, the article/post may not reflect changes in laws/regulations or guidance issued after the date the article/post was published. Please consult with counsel of your choice regarding any specific questions you may have.
ADVERTISING MATERIAL.
© 2024 Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL. All Rights Reserved
- Partner
Chris Brinkman practices in the firm's Business Representation & Transactions Group with a concentration in venture capital transactions, start-ups & growth companies, securities, and mergers and acquisitions.
Chris ...
- Partner
Mike Hurst is a partner in the firm's Business Representation and Transactions Group, a member of the firm's Intellectual Property Group, and co-leader of the firm's multi-disciplinary Cannabis & Craft Beer Teams. His practice is ...
- Partner
Mark Reuter advocates for business clients in transactions, proceedings and conflicts regulated by federal and state securities laws and stock exchange rules. A partner in the firm’s Business Representation & Transactions ...
- Partner
As a partner in the firm’s Business Representation & Transactions Group, Allie Westfall’s insight and proven analytical skills help translate the complexities of the often-challenging securities laws. Allie’s counsel ...
Topics/Tags
Select- Cannabis
- Recreational Marijuana
- Medical Marijuana
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- Trademark
- Craft Brewing
- Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
- Investors
- Private Placements
- Regulation D
- Securities Law
- Securities Regulation
- Department of Justice
- Intellectual Property
- Registered Trademark
- Zoning
- United States Patent and Trademark Office
- Drug Enforcement Agency
- Trademark Litigation
Recent Posts
- A Post-Issue 2 Update on Recreational Marijuana in Ohio
- There Goes the Neighborhood? – A Quick Look at the Sessions Memo
- Booze is Booze, Right? Not so fast...
- Did A Neural Network Just Solve Craft Brewing's Trademark Problems?
- New Rules Regulating the Ohio Medical Marijuana Control Program
- 10 Important Risk Factors to Disclose to Investors of Your Medical Marijuana Business (Part 2 of 2)
- 10 Important Risk Factors to Disclose to Investors of Your Medical Marijuana Business (Part 1 of 2)
- Medical Marijuana Zoning: Location, Location, Location
- Marijuana Justice Act Would Pave the Way for Marijuana Legalization
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries Coming to Cincinnati...?