This week, the SEC released proposed rules intended to implement Section 955 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”), which would require SEC reporting companies to disclose in their annual meeting proxy statements whether the company permits its employees (including officers) and directors to hedge equity securities of the company.
As proposed, the rules would require companies to disclose in their proxy statements whether any employee or director, or any designee of such employee or director, is permitted to purchase financial instruments (including prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars, and exchange funds) that are designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of equity securities. The company would also have to disclose any permitted transactions that would have economic consequences comparable to the purchase of these specified financial instruments, such as short sales or sales of futures. Permitted hedging transactions must be described in sufficient detail to explain the scope of such permitted transactions.
A proposed instruction would clarify that the company must disclose which categories of transactions it permits and which categories of transactions it prohibits. If a company specifically prohibits certain hedging transactions, it could disclose the categories it specifically prohibits and then disclose that it permits all others. Similarly, if the company only permits certain categories of hedging transactions, it could identify those permitted categories and then disclose that it prohibits all others. If all are permitted or all are prohibited, identifying categories would not be required.
The disclosure would be required in instances when other corporate governance disclosures are required, but would be not part of the proxy statement’s Compensation Discussion and Analysis (”CD&A”) section. However, companies looking to avoid duplicative disclosure could cross reference the new disclosure in their CD&A to the extent that the new disclosure satisfies the CD&A requirement to disclose material policies on hedging by named executive officers.
It is important to note that the proposed rules do not prohibit or restrict hedging activities in any way. Rather, they seek to force companies to be transparent about any means by which executives and directors may purchase these types of protective financial instruments.
The proposed rules would apply to all SEC reporting companies, including emerging growth companies and smaller reporting companies, but final rules will not be issued in time for the 2015 proxy season.
Linked here is a summary chart showing the status of the SEC’s implementation of certain provisions of Dodd-Frank.
- Partner
Mark Reuter advocates for business clients in transactions, proceedings and conflicts regulated by federal and state securities laws and stock exchange rules. A partner in the firm’s Business Representation & Transactions ...
- Partner
As a partner in the firm’s Business Representation & Transactions Group, Allie Westfall’s insight and proven analytical skills help translate the complexities of the often-challenging securities laws. Allie’s counsel ...
Topics/Tags
Select- Securities Law
- SEC
- Nasdaq
- Corporate Transparency Act
- Cybersecurity and Privacy Law
- Securities Regulation
- Cybersecurity Regulation
- IRS
- Corporate Law
- Tax Planning
- Coronavirus
- Clawback Rules
- SEC Enforcement
- Taxation
- Dodd-Frank
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- Paycheck Protection Program
- JOBS Act
- Corporate Tax
- Economic Sanctions
- Ohio LLC Act
- FAST Act
- Corporate Governance
- Consumer Protection Act
- Proxy Access Rules
- Securities Litigation
- Crowdfunding
- Conflict Minerals
- Cryptocurrency
- Hedging
- Real Estate Law
- Emerging Growth Companies
- Investors
- Pay Ratio Disclosure
- Whistleblower
- Private Offerings
- Intellectual Property
- Technology
- Opportunity Zone
- LIBOR
- Executive Compensation
- Health Care Act
- Accredited Investors
- Sales Tax
- United States Supreme Court
- Online Trading Platforms
- Wall Street Reform
- IPO
- Registration Statement
- Annual Reports
- Family-Controlled Entities
- Gift and Estate Transfers
- Ohio Foreclosure Reform
- Director Compensation
- Board of Directors
- Director Independence
- Cyber Insurance
- Data Breach
- Lenders
- Receivership Statute
- Regulation A
- Regulation D
- Total Shareholder Return
- Compensation Committee Certification
- CDEs
- CDFI Fund
- Community Development Entities
- Community Development Financial Institutions Fund
- Government Shutdown
- New Markets Tax Credit
- NMTC
- NMTC Financing
- Regulation Fair Disclosure
- Social Media
- Benefits
- Healthcare Reform
- Litigation
- Marketing
- Public Company Transition Rules
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Tax Credit
Recent Posts
- Fifth Circuit Nixes Nasdaq Board Diversity Rules
- Corporate Transparency Act Update: Texas Federal Court Issues Nationwide Injunction
- SEC Fines Four Companies $7M for Violating Cyber Disclosure Rules
- FinCEN Issues Additional Guidance for Reporting Companies on Dissolved Entities
- Division of Corporation Finance Director Statement: The State of Disclosure Review
- FinCEN Issues Additional Guidance for HOAs and Trusts under the Corporate Transparency Act
- SEC Wins ‘Shadow Insider Trading’ Trial
- SEC Voluntarily Stays Climate Rules
- New SEC Climate Disclosure Rules – Temporarily Stayed
- Corporate Transparency Act Ruled Unconstitutional