On April 29, 2015, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) approved the issuance of proposed rules to implement Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”), regarding the disclosure of pay versus performance. The proposed rules would require reporting issuers to disclose the relationship between named executive officer “actual” pay and the issuer’s and its peer’s total shareholder return (“TSR”). Once implemented, the rule would require disclosure in proxy statements and consent solicitations in which compensation disclosure is required. Foreign private issuers, registered investment companies and emerging growth companies will be exempted from the proposed disclosure.
According to the proposed rules, a new tabular disclosure will be required that contains executive compensation disclosures including the following: (A) the CEO’s total compensation and the average of the other named executive officer’s total compensation as reported in the summary compensation table; (B) the CEO’s “actual” pay and the average of the other named executive officers’ “actual” pay; and (C) the issuer’s and its peers’ annual TSR, using the definition of TSR from Item 201(e) of Regulation S-K and using the peer group from either the Item 201(e) performance graph or reported in the compensation discussion and analysis.
To determine the “actual” pay, the company will start with the total amount reported in the summary compensation table with the following adjustments: (A) equity awards will be considered actually paid on the date of vesting and at fair value on that date, rather than fair value on the grant date as required in the summary compensation table; and (B) change in pension value will excluded and replaced with an actuarially determined service cost (although this is not required for smaller reporting companies).
The disclosure will cover the last five fiscal years, but smaller reporting companies will only be required to show the last three fiscal years and will not be required to disclose peer group TSR information.
The proposed rules will require the issuer to describe, using the information identified in the new table, the relationship between executive compensation actually paid and the issuer’s TSR, and the relationship between the issuer’s TSR and the TSR of its selected peer group. This disclosure may be accomplished through narrative or graphical disclosure, or a combination of the two. In addition, the disclosure will be required to be tagged in an interactive data format using XBRL, which would be the first table in a proxy statement required to be in XBRL format.
A phase-in period of the requirements has been proposed. For issuers other than smaller reporting companies, the proposed rules will be phased in over three years with three years of disclosure initially required and five years of disclosure eventually required. Smaller reporting companies will initially be required to disclose two years of information and three years of information thereafter.
The proposed rules are subject to comment for 60 days after publication in the Federal Register. We will continue to provide updates as appropriate on the proposed rules and their affect on issuers.
- Partner
Mark Reuter advocates for business clients in transactions, proceedings and conflicts regulated by federal and state securities laws and stock exchange rules. A partner in the firm’s Business Representation & Transactions ...
- Partner
As a partner in the firm’s Business Representation & Transactions Group, Allie Westfall’s insight and proven analytical skills help translate the complexities of the often-challenging securities laws. Allie’s counsel ...
Topics/Tags
Select- Securities Law
- SEC
- Corporate Transparency Act
- Nasdaq
- Cybersecurity and Privacy Law
- Securities Regulation
- Cybersecurity Regulation
- Corporate Law
- IRS
- Tax Planning
- Coronavirus
- Clawback Rules
- SEC Enforcement
- Taxation
- Dodd-Frank
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- Paycheck Protection Program
- JOBS Act
- Corporate Tax
- Economic Sanctions
- FAST Act
- Ohio LLC Act
- Corporate Governance
- Consumer Protection Act
- Proxy Access Rules
- Securities Litigation
- Crowdfunding
- Conflict Minerals
- Cryptocurrency
- Hedging
- Real Estate Law
- Emerging Growth Companies
- Investors
- Pay Ratio Disclosure
- Whistleblower
- Private Offerings
- Intellectual Property
- Technology
- Opportunity Zone
- LIBOR
- Executive Compensation
- Health Care Act
- Accredited Investors
- Sales Tax
- United States Supreme Court
- Online Trading Platforms
- Wall Street Reform
- IPO
- Registration Statement
- Annual Reports
- Family-Controlled Entities
- Gift and Estate Transfers
- Ohio Foreclosure Reform
- Director Compensation
- Board of Directors
- Director Independence
- Cyber Insurance
- Data Breach
- Lenders
- Receivership Statute
- Regulation A
- Regulation D
- Total Shareholder Return
- Compensation Committee Certification
- CDEs
- CDFI Fund
- Community Development Entities
- Community Development Financial Institutions Fund
- Government Shutdown
- New Markets Tax Credit
- NMTC
- NMTC Financing
- Regulation Fair Disclosure
- Social Media
- Benefits
- Healthcare Reform
- Litigation
- Marketing
- Public Company Transition Rules
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Tax Credit
Recent Posts
- Corporate Transparency Act Updates: Fifth Circuit Vacates the Stay and Preliminary Injunction Reinstated
- Corporate Transparency Act Reporting Deadline Back in Effect; FinCEN Grants Deadline Extension
- Fifth Circuit Nixes Nasdaq Board Diversity Rules
- Corporate Transparency Act Update: Texas Federal Court Issues Nationwide Injunction
- SEC Fines Four Companies $7M for Violating Cyber Disclosure Rules
- FinCEN Issues Additional Guidance for Reporting Companies on Dissolved Entities
- Division of Corporation Finance Director Statement: The State of Disclosure Review
- FinCEN Issues Additional Guidance for HOAs and Trusts under the Corporate Transparency Act
- SEC Wins ‘Shadow Insider Trading’ Trial
- SEC Voluntarily Stays Climate Rules