On August 5, 2015, the Securities and Exchange Commission approved its final “Pay Ratio Disclosure” rules as mandated by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The final rules require annual disclosure of the ratio of a reporting company’s principal executive officer’s total annual compensation to the median of the total annual compensation of all its employees. Most public companies will be required to make the pay ratio disclosure following their first full fiscal year beginning on or after January 1, 2017. Specifically, for a calendar-year reporting company, the first pay ratio disclosure must be made in the proxy statement for its 2018 annual meeting.
Under the final rules a company must disclose:
-
the CEO’s annual total compensation (no change in the method of calculation);
-
the median employee’s annual total compensation; and,
-
the ratio of these two amounts.
A company must calculate the median employee’s annual total compensation in accordance with existing SEC executive compensation disclosure rules.
The pay ratio disclosure may be expressed as a ratio or as a multiple. The disclosure is required only for the last completed fiscal year. A company must also briefly describe the methodology used to identify the median employee and any material estimates, adjustments or assumptions used in determining the ratio.
A company may determine its median employee by analyzing all full-time, part-time, seasonal, and temporary workers it employs and any of its consolidated subsidiaries as of a date it selects within the last three months of its fiscal year. However, companies are not permitted to make full-time equivalent adjustments for part-time employees or to include annualized adjustments for temporary and seasonal workers. When selecting the median employee, companies may, but are not required to, annualize the total compensation for permanent employees who did not work a full year, such as new hires.
A company may choose a method to identify the median employee based on its own facts and circumstances and may use either its total population of employees or a statistical sample of that population.
The rules allow certain additional computational flexibility, permitting companies to:
-
use the same median employee for the three most recent fiscal years unless there has been a change in the employee population or compensation arrangements that would significantly impact the calculation;
-
exclude certain non-U.S. employees from the calculation where foreign data privacy laws prevent companies from obtaining such information;
-
exclude up to 5% of non-U.S. employees, provided that all employees in a particular jurisdiction are excluded; and,
-
make cost-of-living adjustments when identifying the median employee and in calculating the median employee’s annual total compensation.
The rules do not apply to smaller reporting companies, foreign private issuers, or emerging growth companies.
- Partner
Mark Reuter advocates for business clients in transactions, proceedings and conflicts regulated by federal and state securities laws and stock exchange rules. A partner in the firm’s Business Representation & Transactions ...
- Partner
As a partner in the firm’s Business Representation & Transactions Group, Allie Westfall’s insight and proven analytical skills help translate the complexities of the often-challenging securities laws. Allie’s counsel ...
Topics/Tags
Select- Securities Law
- SEC
- Nasdaq
- Corporate Transparency Act
- Cybersecurity and Privacy Law
- Securities Regulation
- Cybersecurity Regulation
- IRS
- Corporate Law
- Tax Planning
- Coronavirus
- Clawback Rules
- SEC Enforcement
- Taxation
- Dodd-Frank
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- Paycheck Protection Program
- JOBS Act
- Corporate Tax
- Economic Sanctions
- Ohio LLC Act
- FAST Act
- Corporate Governance
- Consumer Protection Act
- Proxy Access Rules
- Securities Litigation
- Crowdfunding
- Conflict Minerals
- Cryptocurrency
- Hedging
- Real Estate Law
- Emerging Growth Companies
- Investors
- Pay Ratio Disclosure
- Whistleblower
- Private Offerings
- Intellectual Property
- Technology
- Opportunity Zone
- LIBOR
- Executive Compensation
- Health Care Act
- Accredited Investors
- Sales Tax
- United States Supreme Court
- Online Trading Platforms
- Wall Street Reform
- IPO
- Registration Statement
- Annual Reports
- Family-Controlled Entities
- Gift and Estate Transfers
- Ohio Foreclosure Reform
- Director Compensation
- Board of Directors
- Director Independence
- Cyber Insurance
- Data Breach
- Lenders
- Receivership Statute
- Regulation A
- Regulation D
- Total Shareholder Return
- Compensation Committee Certification
- CDEs
- CDFI Fund
- Community Development Entities
- Community Development Financial Institutions Fund
- Government Shutdown
- New Markets Tax Credit
- NMTC
- NMTC Financing
- Regulation Fair Disclosure
- Social Media
- Benefits
- Healthcare Reform
- Litigation
- Marketing
- Public Company Transition Rules
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Tax Credit
Recent Posts
- Fifth Circuit Nixes Nasdaq Board Diversity Rules
- Corporate Transparency Act Update: Texas Federal Court Issues Nationwide Injunction
- SEC Fines Four Companies $7M for Violating Cyber Disclosure Rules
- FinCEN Issues Additional Guidance for Reporting Companies on Dissolved Entities
- Division of Corporation Finance Director Statement: The State of Disclosure Review
- FinCEN Issues Additional Guidance for HOAs and Trusts under the Corporate Transparency Act
- SEC Wins ‘Shadow Insider Trading’ Trial
- SEC Voluntarily Stays Climate Rules
- New SEC Climate Disclosure Rules – Temporarily Stayed
- Corporate Transparency Act Ruled Unconstitutional