On October 18, 2010, the SEC released proposed rules on "Shareholder Approval of Executive Compensation and Golden Parachute Compensation" which address three separate shareholder votes mandated by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act for annual meetings of shareholders conducted on or after January 21, 2011.
Each of the three votes, (1) Say-on-Pay, (2) Say-on-Frequency and (3) Say-on-Parachutes, would be advisory and would apply to all U.S. public companies, including smaller reporting companies. Say-on-Parachutes votes would apply only to proxy statements for meetings where shareholders are asked to approve a merger or other extraordinary transaction. Neither the Say-on-Pay nor Say-on-Frequency votes would require companies to file preliminary proxy materials. While companies would be able to elect to make any vote binding, all companies would have to explain any effects of the vote.
Also, the proposal would permit companies to exclude a Say-on-Pay or Say-on-Frequency shareholder vote if they have adopted a Say-on-Pay or Say-on-Frequency policy consistent with what was favored by a plurality of the votes cast in the most recent Say-on-Pay or Say-on-Frequency vote. Additionally, because each of Say-on-Pay, Say-on-Frequency and Say-on-Parachutes would be considered an executive compensation matter, brokers will not be able to cast discretionary votes on these items.
Say-on-Pay
The proposal would require companies to conduct a non-binding shareholder vote to approve the compensation of executives. The compensation to be approved would have to be disclosed in Compensation Discussion and Analysis (for all companies except smaller reporting companies), compensation tables, and other executive compensation disclosures in the company’s 2011 proxy materials.
Say-on-Frequency
The proposal also would require companies to allow shareholders to vote on how often they would like to cast a Say-on-Pay vote, namely: every year, every other year, or once every three years. Companies would be required to conduct this vote at their 2011 meetings and at least once every six years thereafter. Companies would also be permitted to include their recommendation with respect to frequency.
Say-on-Parachutes
In connection with this vote, companies must include in the merger proxy materials narrative and tabular disclosure regarding all transaction-related compensation arrangements between the target and acquiring corporations and their named executive officers.
Companies that have previously disclosed such arrangements in their annual proxy materials would not be required to hold this Say-on-Parachutes vote so long as their previous disclosure meets all of the new requirements, which are substantially more detailed than the existing compensation disclosure requirements with respect to potential payments upon termination or change-in-control.
- Partner
Mark Reuter advocates for business clients in transactions, proceedings and conflicts regulated by federal and state securities laws and stock exchange rules. A partner in the firm’s Business Representation & Transactions ...
Topics/Tags
Select- Securities Law
- SEC
- Cybersecurity and Privacy Law
- Corporate Transparency Act
- Securities Regulation
- Nasdaq
- Corporate Law
- EDGAR
- EDGAR Next
- IRS
- Cybersecurity Regulation
- Tax Planning
- Coronavirus
- Clawback Rules
- SEC Enforcement
- Taxation
- Dodd-Frank
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- Paycheck Protection Program
- JOBS Act
- Corporate Tax
- Corporate Governance
- FAST Act
- Economic Sanctions
- Ohio LLC Act
- Consumer Protection Act
- Proxy Access Rules
- Securities Litigation
- Crowdfunding
- Conflict Minerals
- Cryptocurrency
- Hedging
- Real Estate Law
- Emerging Growth Companies
- Investors
- Pay Ratio Disclosure
- Whistleblower
- Private Offerings
- Intellectual Property
- Technology
- LIBOR
- Opportunity Zone
- Executive Compensation
- Health Care Act
- Accredited Investors
- Sales Tax
- United States Supreme Court
- Online Trading Platforms
- Wall Street Reform
- IPO
- Registration Statement
- Annual Reports
- Family-Controlled Entities
- Gift and Estate Transfers
- Ohio Foreclosure Reform
- Director Compensation
- Board of Directors
- Director Independence
- Total Shareholder Return
- Cyber Insurance
- Data Breach
- Lenders
- Receivership Statute
- Regulation A
- Regulation D
- CDEs
- CDFI Fund
- Community Development Entities
- Community Development Financial Institutions Fund
- Compensation Committee Certification
- Government Shutdown
- New Markets Tax Credit
- NMTC
- NMTC Financing
- Regulation Fair Disclosure
- Social Media
- Marketing
- Benefits
- Healthcare Reform
- Litigation
- Public Company Transition Rules
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Tax Credit
Recent Posts
- Pay vs. Performance and Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules: Will the SEC Retract Rulemaking?
- Corporate Transparency Act Update: FinCEN Eliminates Reporting Obligations for U.S. Companies and U.S. Persons
- Corporate Transparency Act Update: FinCEN Will Not Enforce the CTA Until Interim Rule is Effective
- Corporate Transparency Act Update: Injunction Lifted - Corporate Transparency Act Back in Effect
- Corporate Transparency Act Update: FinCEN Says Reporting Obligations Remain On Hold
- Next Up in 2025: EDGAR Next
- Corporate Transparency Act Update: Supreme Court Stays Nationwide Injunction – CTA Reporting Obligations Back in Effect
- Corporate Transparency Act Updates: Fifth Circuit Vacates the Stay and Preliminary Injunction Reinstated
- Corporate Transparency Act Reporting Deadline Back in Effect; FinCEN Grants Deadline Extension
- Fifth Circuit Nixes Nasdaq Board Diversity Rules