Although there is much discussion of potential legal immunity from COVID-19 related tort claims among Congressional leaders, states are more likely to take the first steps. The outline for potential liability protection is progressing in the Ohio General Assembly as House Bill 606 and Senate Bill 308 have now been conformed so that substantially similar bills are progressing simultaneously through both houses of the General Assembly. The progress of the bills have garnered support from the leadership of the General Assembly as both Senate President Obhof and Speaker Householder commented that their chambers would prioritize tort liability for businesses reopening during the pandemic. Both bills provide for the following:
- Civil immunity would be provided for health care providers for withholding or withdrawing health care services, emergency medical services, first-aid treatment, or other emergency professional care during an epidemic, public health emergency or other disaster unless the conduct constitutes willful or wanton conduct.
- Civil immunity for all businesses against exposure claims from employees or patrons of the business that are based on an injury or death alleged to have been caused by the transmission of a coronavirus infection, unless it established by clear and convincing evidence that the infection was transmitted by reckless or intentional conduct or with willful or wanton misconduct.
- Civil immunity would be provided to a person who provides services for essential businesses and operations for injury, death or loss that was caused by the transmission of COVID-19 during the period of emergency declared by Executive Order 2020-01D, issued on March 9, 2020 unless the person was providing services for essential businesses and operations acts manifestly outside the scope of the person’s responsibilities, with malicious purpose, in bad faith, or in a wanton or reckless manner.
Whether any legislation will be successfully enacted is unclear. Governor DeWine has not publicly taken a position on the issue.
KMK Law articles and blog posts are intended to bring attention to developments in the law and are not intended as legal advice for any particular client or any particular situation. The laws/regulations and interpretations thereof are evolving and subject to change. Although we will attempt to update articles/blog posts for material changes, the article/post may not reflect changes in laws/regulations or guidance issued after the date the article/post was published. Please consult with counsel of your choice regarding any specific questions you may have.
ADVERTISING MATERIAL.
© 2025 Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL. All Rights Reserved
Topics/Tags
Select- SEC
- Corporate Transparency Act
- Securities Law
- Nasdaq
- Securities Regulation
- Cybersecurity and Privacy Law
- EDGAR
- EDGAR Next
- Cybersecurity Regulation
- Corporate Law
- IRS
- Tax Planning
- Coronavirus
- Clawback Rules
- SEC Enforcement
- Taxation
- Dodd-Frank
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- Paycheck Protection Program
- JOBS Act
- Corporate Tax
- Corporate Governance
- FAST Act
- Economic Sanctions
- Ohio LLC Act
- Consumer Protection Act
- Proxy Access Rules
- Securities Litigation
- Crowdfunding
- Conflict Minerals
- Cryptocurrency
- Hedging
- Real Estate Law
- Emerging Growth Companies
- Investors
- Pay Ratio Disclosure
- Whistleblower
- Private Offerings
- Intellectual Property
- Technology
- LIBOR
- Opportunity Zone
- Executive Compensation
- Health Care Act
- Accredited Investors
- Sales Tax
- United States Supreme Court
- Online Trading Platforms
- Wall Street Reform
- IPO
- Registration Statement
- Annual Reports
- Ohio Foreclosure Reform
- Director Compensation
- Family-Controlled Entities
- Gift and Estate Transfers
- Board of Directors
- Director Independence
- Cyber Insurance
- Data Breach
- Regulation A
- Regulation D
- Total Shareholder Return
- Lenders
- Receivership Statute
- Compensation Committee Certification
- CDEs
- CDFI Fund
- Community Development Entities
- Community Development Financial Institutions Fund
- Government Shutdown
- New Markets Tax Credit
- NMTC
- NMTC Financing
- Regulation Fair Disclosure
- Social Media
- Benefits
- Healthcare Reform
- Litigation
- Marketing
- Public Company Transition Rules
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Tax Credit
Recent Posts
- Corporate Transparency Act Update: Injuction Lifted - Corporate Transparency Act Back in Effect
- Corporate Transparency Act Update: FinCEN Says Reporting Obligations Remain On Hold
- Next Up in 2025: EDGAR Next
- Corporate Transparency Act Update: Supreme Court Stays Nationwide Injunction – CTA Reporting Obligations Back in Effect
- Corporate Transparency Act Updates: Fifth Circuit Vacates the Stay and Preliminary Injunction Reinstated
- Corporate Transparency Act Reporting Deadline Back in Effect; FinCEN Grants Deadline Extension
- Fifth Circuit Nixes Nasdaq Board Diversity Rules
- Corporate Transparency Act Update: Texas Federal Court Issues Nationwide Injunction
- SEC Fines Four Companies $7M for Violating Cyber Disclosure Rules
- FinCEN Issues Additional Guidance for Reporting Companies on Dissolved Entities