On July 20, 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued a new Exposure Draft of a proposed Statement, Contingencies (Topic 450), Disclosure of Certain Loss Contingencies. The FASB has proposed various amendments to Topic 450, formerly known as FASB Statement No. 5, in response to investor concerns about the inadequacy of information currently available regarding the likelihood, timing and amount of future cash flows associated with loss contingencies.
The FASB's first Exposure Draft (issued in 2008) received significant push back from the American Bar Association and other groups concerned that additional disclosures in this area could potentially jeopardize attorney-client privilege and reveal litigation strategy. The new Exposure Draft is the result of the FASB directing its staff to retool its approach so that it focuses on disclosure of nonprivileged quantitative information.
Under the new Exposure Draft, companies would still be required to disclose loss contingencies (including asserted claims) where the likelihood of loss is at least reasonably possible. The Exposure Draft would also require disclosure of certain remote loss contingencies, based on (i) their potential effect on the company's operations; (ii) the cost to the company of defending against the claims; and (iii) the amount of effort and resources management may have to devote to resolving them.
The new Exposure Draft requires companies to disclose qualitative information about the loss contingencies that would enable financial statement users to understand their nature, potential timing, and potential magnitude and, for litigation contingencies, to obtain additional information from publicly available sources like court records. The Exposure Draft also requires companies to disclose certain quantitative information for all contingencies that are at least reasonably possible and to make scaled-back quantitative disclosures for those remote loss contingencies requiring disclosure based on the three factors listed above. Finally, the Exposure Draft would require public companies to disclose in tabular format reconciliations by class of recognized (i.e. accrued) loss contingencies in tabular format for each period for which an income statement is presented.
The new Exposure Draft is subject to a 30-day comment period (ending August 20, 2010) and the FASB intends to issue the final Statement shortly after this comment period ends. If the new Statement is adopted on this timeline, for public companies, it will take effect for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2010 and, for nonpublic companies, it will take effect for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010.
We will continue to monitor developments with respect to Topic 450 and this new Exposure Draft, so please check back for an updated blog post once the FASB issues its final Statement.
- Partner
Mark Reuter advocates for business clients in transactions, proceedings and conflicts regulated by federal and state securities laws and stock exchange rules. A partner in the firm’s Business Representation & Transactions ...
Topics/Tags
Select- Securities Law
- SEC
- Nasdaq
- Corporate Transparency Act
- Cybersecurity and Privacy Law
- Securities Regulation
- Cybersecurity Regulation
- Corporate Law
- IRS
- Tax Planning
- Coronavirus
- Clawback Rules
- SEC Enforcement
- Taxation
- Dodd-Frank
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- Paycheck Protection Program
- JOBS Act
- Corporate Tax
- Economic Sanctions
- Ohio LLC Act
- FAST Act
- Corporate Governance
- Consumer Protection Act
- Proxy Access Rules
- Securities Litigation
- Crowdfunding
- Conflict Minerals
- Cryptocurrency
- Hedging
- Real Estate Law
- Emerging Growth Companies
- Investors
- Pay Ratio Disclosure
- Whistleblower
- Private Offerings
- Intellectual Property
- Technology
- Opportunity Zone
- LIBOR
- Executive Compensation
- Health Care Act
- Accredited Investors
- Sales Tax
- United States Supreme Court
- Online Trading Platforms
- Wall Street Reform
- IPO
- Registration Statement
- Annual Reports
- Family-Controlled Entities
- Gift and Estate Transfers
- Ohio Foreclosure Reform
- Director Compensation
- Board of Directors
- Director Independence
- Cyber Insurance
- Data Breach
- Lenders
- Receivership Statute
- Regulation A
- Regulation D
- Total Shareholder Return
- Compensation Committee Certification
- CDEs
- CDFI Fund
- Community Development Entities
- Community Development Financial Institutions Fund
- Government Shutdown
- New Markets Tax Credit
- NMTC
- NMTC Financing
- Regulation Fair Disclosure
- Social Media
- Benefits
- Healthcare Reform
- Litigation
- Marketing
- Public Company Transition Rules
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Tax Credit
Recent Posts
- Fifth Circuit Nixes Nasdaq Board Diversity Rules
- Corporate Transparency Act Update: Texas Federal Court Issues Nationwide Injunction
- SEC Fines Four Companies $7M for Violating Cyber Disclosure Rules
- FinCEN Issues Additional Guidance for Reporting Companies on Dissolved Entities
- Division of Corporation Finance Director Statement: The State of Disclosure Review
- FinCEN Issues Additional Guidance for HOAs and Trusts under the Corporate Transparency Act
- SEC Wins ‘Shadow Insider Trading’ Trial
- SEC Voluntarily Stays Climate Rules
- New SEC Climate Disclosure Rules – Temporarily Stayed
- Corporate Transparency Act Ruled Unconstitutional