On May 13, 2020, the Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”) posted a new update to the Frequently Asked Questions (“FAQs”) it has been periodically updating since passage of the CARES Act. The new FAQ #46 gives borrowers who, together with their affiliates, have received PPP loans in amounts less than $2 million comfort that the Small Business Administration will not challenge the borrower’s certification that the PPP loan was “necessary” due to economic uncertainty.
Prior FAQs raised some uncertainty as to how the SBA would determine if a borrower had made the required certification that “current economic uncertainty makes this loan request necessary to support the ongoing operations” of the borrower in good faith. The new FAQ #46 states, “Any borrower that, together with its affiliates, received PPP loans with an original principal amount of less than $2 million will be deemed to have made the required certification concerning the necessity of the loan request in good faith.” Borrowers with loans greater than $2 million may still have an adequate basis for making the required good-faith certification based on individual facts and circumstances.
Upon review, if the SBA determines a borrower lacked an adequate basis for the required certification, the borrower will be required to repay the loan, but SBA will not seek administrative enforcement or refer the borrower to other federal agencies for civil or criminal penalties if the loan is repaid.
Questions still exist as to how the SBA will evaluate the specific facts and circumstances for borrowers with loans in excess of $2 million, but the new FAQ provides some certainty to the vast majority of PPP borrowers.
UPDATE: Borrowers who do not feel they can meet the good-faith certification requirement and want to repay the loan were previously given a safe harbor for repayment. Newly added FAQ #47 states the SBA will be posting a new interim final rule which moves the deadline for repayment under the safe harbor from May 14, 2020 to May 18, 2020. While the SBA has indicated it will not penalize borrowers who cannot meet the good-faith certification standard if the loan is repaid upon review, there are benefits for borrowers who meet the safe harbor. A borrower who repays the loan under the safe harbor will be treated as if it had not obtained a Payroll Protection Program loan, and may be eligible for other COVID-19 relief such as the Employee Retention Credit.
KMK Law articles and blog posts are intended to bring attention to developments in the law and are not intended as legal advice for any particular client or any particular situation. The laws/regulations and interpretations thereof are evolving and subject to change. Although we will attempt to update articles/blog posts for material changes, the article/post may not reflect changes in laws/regulations or guidance issued after the date the article/post was published. Please consult with counsel of your choice regarding any specific questions you may have.
ADVERTISING MATERIAL.
© 2025 Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL. All Rights Reserved
Topics/Tags
Select- Corporate Transparency Act
- SEC
- Securities Law
- Nasdaq
- Securities Regulation
- Cybersecurity and Privacy Law
- EDGAR
- EDGAR Next
- Corporate Law
- IRS
- Cybersecurity Regulation
- Tax Planning
- Coronavirus
- Clawback Rules
- SEC Enforcement
- Taxation
- Dodd-Frank
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- Paycheck Protection Program
- JOBS Act
- Corporate Tax
- Corporate Governance
- FAST Act
- Economic Sanctions
- Ohio LLC Act
- Consumer Protection Act
- Proxy Access Rules
- Securities Litigation
- Crowdfunding
- Conflict Minerals
- Cryptocurrency
- Hedging
- Real Estate Law
- Emerging Growth Companies
- Investors
- Pay Ratio Disclosure
- Whistleblower
- Private Offerings
- Intellectual Property
- Technology
- Opportunity Zone
- LIBOR
- Executive Compensation
- Health Care Act
- Accredited Investors
- Sales Tax
- United States Supreme Court
- Online Trading Platforms
- Wall Street Reform
- IPO
- Registration Statement
- Annual Reports
- Family-Controlled Entities
- Gift and Estate Transfers
- Ohio Foreclosure Reform
- Director Compensation
- Board of Directors
- Director Independence
- Total Shareholder Return
- Cyber Insurance
- Data Breach
- Lenders
- Receivership Statute
- Regulation A
- Regulation D
- CDEs
- CDFI Fund
- Community Development Entities
- Community Development Financial Institutions Fund
- Compensation Committee Certification
- Government Shutdown
- New Markets Tax Credit
- NMTC
- NMTC Financing
- Regulation Fair Disclosure
- Social Media
- Benefits
- Healthcare Reform
- Litigation
- Marketing
- Public Company Transition Rules
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Tax Credit
Recent Posts
- Corporate Transparency Act Update: FinCEN Eliminates Reporting Obligations for U.S. Companies and U.S. Persons
- Corporate Transparency Act Update: FinCEN Will Not Enforce the CTA Until Interim Rule is Effective
- Corporate Transparency Act Update: Injunction Lifted - Corporate Transparency Act Back in Effect
- Corporate Transparency Act Update: FinCEN Says Reporting Obligations Remain On Hold
- Next Up in 2025: EDGAR Next
- Corporate Transparency Act Update: Supreme Court Stays Nationwide Injunction – CTA Reporting Obligations Back in Effect
- Corporate Transparency Act Updates: Fifth Circuit Vacates the Stay and Preliminary Injunction Reinstated
- Corporate Transparency Act Reporting Deadline Back in Effect; FinCEN Grants Deadline Extension
- Fifth Circuit Nixes Nasdaq Board Diversity Rules
- Corporate Transparency Act Update: Texas Federal Court Issues Nationwide Injunction