On July 1, 2016, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) approved changes to Nasdaq Listing Rules 5250 and 5615 requiring Nasdaq-listed companies to publicly disclose compensation or other arrangements by third parties to directors or nominees for director. The new requirements take effect July 31, 2016.
Under the new Nasdaq Listing Rule 5250(b)(3), each Nasdaq-listed company is now required to publicly disclose the material terms of all agreements or arrangements between any director or nominee for director on the company’s board and any person or entity (other than the company) relating to compensation or other payment in connection with that person’s candidacy or service as a director. The disclosure requirement encompasses non-cash compensation and other forms of payment obligation, such as indemnification. The disclosure of all such agreements and arrangements must be made no later than the date that the company files or furnishes a definitive proxy or information statement in connection with the company’s next shareholders’ meeting at which directors are elected, and the disclosure must continue at least annually until the director no longer serves in such role or one year after the disclosed agreement or arrangement terminates. The required disclosure can be made either through the company’s website or in the definitive proxy or information statement. If a listed company discovers an agreement or arrangement that should have been disclosed but was not disclosed, then the company must promptly make the required disclosure by filing a Form 8-K or by issuing a press release.
The new rules provide that listed companies will not need to make disclosure of agreements or arrangements that: (i) relate only to reimbursement of expenses in connection with candidacy as a director; (ii) existed prior to the nominee’s candidacy and the nominee’s relationship with the third party has been publicly disclosed in a definitive proxy or information statement or annual report; or (iii) have been disclosed in proxy materials or a Form 8-K in the current fiscal year, provided that the company will still need to make its annual disclosure in the following years.
Non-Nasdaq-listed public companies may also want to take note of this new development. It is arguable that the same disclosure requirements listed in Nasdaq’s new rules may be required to be disclosed by all public companies pursuant to Item 5 of Schedule 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, although there is no clear guidance on this point. If the new requirements made explicit to Nasdaq-listed companies achieve desired effects, the SEC may follow suit with its own similar guidance applicable to all publicly traded companies.
- Partner
Chris Brinkman practices in the firm's Business Representation & Transactions Group with a concentration in venture capital transactions, start-ups & growth companies, securities, and mergers and acquisitions.
Chris ...
- Partner
Mark Reuter advocates for business clients in transactions, proceedings and conflicts regulated by federal and state securities laws and stock exchange rules. A partner in the firm’s Business Representation & Transactions ...
- Partner
As a partner in the firm’s Business Representation & Transactions Group, Allie Westfall’s insight and proven analytical skills help translate the complexities of the often-challenging securities laws. Allie’s counsel ...
Topics/Tags
Select- Securities Law
- SEC
- Nasdaq
- Corporate Transparency Act
- Cybersecurity and Privacy Law
- Securities Regulation
- Cybersecurity Regulation
- IRS
- Corporate Law
- Tax Planning
- Coronavirus
- Clawback Rules
- SEC Enforcement
- Taxation
- Dodd-Frank
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- Paycheck Protection Program
- JOBS Act
- Corporate Tax
- Economic Sanctions
- Ohio LLC Act
- FAST Act
- Corporate Governance
- Consumer Protection Act
- Proxy Access Rules
- Securities Litigation
- Crowdfunding
- Conflict Minerals
- Cryptocurrency
- Hedging
- Real Estate Law
- Emerging Growth Companies
- Investors
- Pay Ratio Disclosure
- Whistleblower
- Private Offerings
- Intellectual Property
- Technology
- Opportunity Zone
- LIBOR
- Executive Compensation
- Health Care Act
- Accredited Investors
- Sales Tax
- United States Supreme Court
- Online Trading Platforms
- Wall Street Reform
- IPO
- Registration Statement
- Annual Reports
- Family-Controlled Entities
- Gift and Estate Transfers
- Ohio Foreclosure Reform
- Director Compensation
- Board of Directors
- Director Independence
- Cyber Insurance
- Data Breach
- Lenders
- Receivership Statute
- Regulation A
- Regulation D
- Total Shareholder Return
- Compensation Committee Certification
- CDEs
- CDFI Fund
- Community Development Entities
- Community Development Financial Institutions Fund
- Government Shutdown
- New Markets Tax Credit
- NMTC
- NMTC Financing
- Regulation Fair Disclosure
- Social Media
- Benefits
- Healthcare Reform
- Litigation
- Marketing
- Public Company Transition Rules
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Tax Credit
Recent Posts
- Fifth Circuit Nixes Nasdaq Board Diversity Rules
- Corporate Transparency Act Update: Texas Federal Court Issues Nationwide Injunction
- SEC Fines Four Companies $7M for Violating Cyber Disclosure Rules
- FinCEN Issues Additional Guidance for Reporting Companies on Dissolved Entities
- Division of Corporation Finance Director Statement: The State of Disclosure Review
- FinCEN Issues Additional Guidance for HOAs and Trusts under the Corporate Transparency Act
- SEC Wins ‘Shadow Insider Trading’ Trial
- SEC Voluntarily Stays Climate Rules
- New SEC Climate Disclosure Rules – Temporarily Stayed
- Corporate Transparency Act Ruled Unconstitutional