On November 2, 2020, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted rule amendments intended to increase opportunities for private companies to raise capital, including by setting higher limits on certain private offerings. The SEC also simplified certain rules governing private offerings relating to investor communications and otherwise expanding investment opportunities. In addition to expanding access to capital for private issuers, the intent of these amendments is to make it simpler for issuers to comply with increasingly complex SEC rules, including by eliminating excessive paperwork and legal costs. The summary below outlines these amendments, most of which will become effective 60 days following publication in the Federal Register.
I. Increase in Annual Limits on Certain Private Offerings
The SEC increased the annual limit on Tier 2 Regulation A offerings from $50 million to $75 million. The annual limit of $20 million for Tier 1 Regulation A offerings remains unchanged. Additionally, the SEC increased the annual limits on crowdfunding campaigns from $1.07 million to $5 million and on Rule 504 offerings from $5 million to $10 million.
II. Other Amendments to Rules Governing Private Offerings
The amendments allow companies to engage in more “testing the waters” communications with investors in crowdfunding offerings to more accurately measure potential investor interest in such offerings. Permitting issuers to engage in these communications allows them to consult with investors to evaluate demand prior to offering to sell any securities, which is already allowed with Reg A+ offerings. In addition, the amendments permit companies to make investor pitches during “demo days” without violating securities laws prohibitions on general solicitation.
The amendments eliminated funding limits on accredited investors when contributing to crowdfunding campaigns. These investors are not subject to limits with respect to other private placements. However, as noted above, the offering limit of the crowdfunding campaign within any 12-month period may not exceed $5 million.
Finally, issuers will not be deemed to be in violation of the SEC’s “integration” rules, which are intended to prevent issuers from avoiding registration requirements by conducting large private offerings within a short period of time, provided the issuer waits 30 days between offerings and has a reasonable belief that the issuer did not solicit each investor through general solicitation or otherwise established a substantive relationship with the investor prior to the commencement of the offering. Currently, issuers are required to wait six months between offerings to avoid violating integration rules.
For more information on the matters discussed in this advisory, please contact Mark Reuter, Jim Kennedy, Allie Westfall, Chris Brinkman or Brett Niehauser. To ensure that you are current on recent activities, subscribe to our Corporate & Securities Blog by entering your email address in the sidebar.
KMK Law articles and blog posts are intended to bring attention to developments in the law and are not intended as legal advice for any particular client or any particular situation. The laws/regulations and interpretations thereof are evolving and subject to change. Although we will attempt to update articles/blog posts for material changes, the article/post may not reflect changes in laws/regulations or guidance issued after the date the article/post was published. Please consult with counsel of your choice regarding any specific questions you may have.
ADVERTISING MATERIAL.
© 2024 Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL. All Rights Reserved
- Partner
Mark Reuter advocates for business clients in transactions, proceedings and conflicts regulated by federal and state securities laws and stock exchange rules. A partner in the firm’s Business Representation & Transactions ...
Topics/Tags
Select- SEC
- Securities Law
- Cybersecurity and Privacy Law
- Securities Regulation
- Cybersecurity Regulation
- Corporate Transparency Act
- IRS
- Corporate Law
- Tax Planning
- Coronavirus
- Nasdaq
- Clawback Rules
- SEC Enforcement
- Taxation
- Dodd-Frank
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- Paycheck Protection Program
- JOBS Act
- Corporate Tax
- Economic Sanctions
- Ohio LLC Act
- FAST Act
- Corporate Governance
- Consumer Protection Act
- Proxy Access Rules
- Securities Litigation
- Crowdfunding
- Conflict Minerals
- Cryptocurrency
- Hedging
- Real Estate Law
- Emerging Growth Companies
- Investors
- Pay Ratio Disclosure
- Whistleblower
- Private Offerings
- Intellectual Property
- Technology
- Opportunity Zone
- LIBOR
- Executive Compensation
- Health Care Act
- Accredited Investors
- Sales Tax
- United States Supreme Court
- Online Trading Platforms
- Wall Street Reform
- IPO
- Registration Statement
- Annual Reports
- Ohio Foreclosure Reform
- Director Compensation
- Family-Controlled Entities
- Gift and Estate Transfers
- Board of Directors
- Director Independence
- Total Shareholder Return
- Cyber Insurance
- Data Breach
- Lenders
- Receivership Statute
- Regulation A
- Regulation D
- Compensation Committee Certification
- Government Shutdown
- CDEs
- CDFI Fund
- Community Development Entities
- Community Development Financial Institutions Fund
- New Markets Tax Credit
- NMTC
- NMTC Financing
- Regulation Fair Disclosure
- Social Media
- Benefits
- Healthcare Reform
- Litigation
- Marketing
- Public Company Transition Rules
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Tax Credit
Recent Posts
- SEC Fines Four Companies $7M for Violating Cyber Disclosure Rules
- FinCEN Issues Additional Guidance for Reporting Companies on Dissolved Entities
- Division of Corporation Finance Director Statement: The State of Disclosure Review
- FinCEN Issues Additional Guidance for HOAs and Trusts under the Corporate Transparency Act
- SEC Wins ‘Shadow Insider Trading’ Trial
- SEC Voluntarily Stays Climate Rules
- New SEC Climate Disclosure Rules – Temporarily Stayed
- Corporate Transparency Act Ruled Unconstitutional
- SEC Climate Rule Vote Scheduled for March 6, 2024
- Limited Partners’ Tax Savings from Self-Employment Taxes are under Scrutiny