On May 20, 2020, the State of Ohio Department of Health (ODH) issued an urgent health advisory (the “Advisory”), named “Ohioans Protecting Ohioans”, in which all individuals currently living within the State of Ohio are recommended to continue to stay at home or at their place of residence to lower the rate of spread of COVID-19. A copy of the Advisory can be found here. Based on Governor DeWine’s press conference on May 19, 2020, the Advisory was meant to replace the “Stay Safe Ohio” Order (the “Order”) that was issued by the Ohio Department of Health on April 30, 2020, by providing recommendations that Ohioans stay at home as much as possible instead of mandating such limitations. Although Governor DeWine indicated that the Advisory would replace the Order, the Advisory does not expressly supersede the Order, so it is unclear the extent to which the Order may still be enforceable. Below are the primary highlights of the Advisory:
- The Advisory provides that elderly individuals and individuals who are vulnerable to COVID-19 due to illness are “strongly urged” to stay in their residence except to seek medical care. These individuals include people over the age of 65 and people of all ages with underlying medical conditions. Furthermore, these individuals are “urged” to avoid places with large numbers of people and are encouraged to wear masks.
- All other individuals are “advised” to take precautions to limit the spread of COVID-19. As such, the Advisory also “recommends”, but does not require, that these individuals stay in their place of residence when possible.
UPDATE: On the same day, ODH also issued an order (the “Order”) that partially rescinded and modified the “Stay Safe Ohio” Order (the “Stay at Home Order”) that was issued by ODH on April 30, 2020. Except as rescinded or modified by the Order, the Stay at Home Order remains in effect and legally enforceable. A copy of the Order can be found here. Below is a summary of the Order:
- Section 3 of the Stay at Home Order, which required individuals in Ohio to stay at their place of residence except as otherwise permitted by the Stay at Home Order, was rescinded.
- Section 5 of the Stay at Home Order, which required individuals traveling to Ohio from another state to quarantine for 14 days (excepting travel for work), was modified to restrict travel into Ohio only by individuals who have been diagnosed with COVID-19 or have exhibited symptoms associated with COVID-19, as identified by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and ODH.
- This restriction does not apply to individuals who travel to Ohio for medical care or are otherwise a permanent resident of Ohio.
- Section 15 of the Stay at Home Order, which allowed Ohio residents to travel from their place of residence only for limited purposes, was rescinded.
KMK Law articles and blog posts are intended to bring attention to developments in the law and are not intended as legal advice for any particular client or any particular situation. The laws/regulations and interpretations thereof are evolving and subject to change. Although we will attempt to update articles/blog posts for material changes, the article/post may not reflect changes in laws/regulations or guidance issued after the date the article/post was published. Please consult with counsel of your choice regarding any specific questions you may have.
ADVERTISING MATERIAL.
© 2024 Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL. All Rights Reserved
- Partner
Rob Lesan co-leads the firm’s Business Representation & Transactions Group, bringing extensive experience in mergers, acquisitions, private equity investment, divestitures, joint ventures, and general corporate ...
Topics/Tags
Select- Securities Law
- SEC
- Nasdaq
- Corporate Transparency Act
- Cybersecurity and Privacy Law
- Securities Regulation
- Cybersecurity Regulation
- IRS
- Corporate Law
- Tax Planning
- Coronavirus
- Clawback Rules
- SEC Enforcement
- Taxation
- Dodd-Frank
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- Paycheck Protection Program
- JOBS Act
- Corporate Tax
- Economic Sanctions
- Ohio LLC Act
- FAST Act
- Corporate Governance
- Consumer Protection Act
- Proxy Access Rules
- Securities Litigation
- Crowdfunding
- Conflict Minerals
- Cryptocurrency
- Hedging
- Real Estate Law
- Emerging Growth Companies
- Investors
- Pay Ratio Disclosure
- Whistleblower
- Private Offerings
- Intellectual Property
- Technology
- LIBOR
- Opportunity Zone
- Executive Compensation
- Health Care Act
- Accredited Investors
- Sales Tax
- United States Supreme Court
- Online Trading Platforms
- Wall Street Reform
- IPO
- Registration Statement
- Annual Reports
- Family-Controlled Entities
- Gift and Estate Transfers
- Ohio Foreclosure Reform
- Director Compensation
- Board of Directors
- Director Independence
- Cyber Insurance
- Data Breach
- Lenders
- Receivership Statute
- Regulation A
- Regulation D
- Total Shareholder Return
- Compensation Committee Certification
- CDEs
- CDFI Fund
- Community Development Entities
- Community Development Financial Institutions Fund
- Government Shutdown
- New Markets Tax Credit
- NMTC
- NMTC Financing
- Regulation Fair Disclosure
- Social Media
- Benefits
- Healthcare Reform
- Litigation
- Marketing
- Public Company Transition Rules
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Tax Credit
Recent Posts
- Fifth Circuit Nixes Nasdaq Board Diversity Rules
- Corporate Transparency Act Update: Texas Federal Court Issues Nationwide Injunction
- SEC Fines Four Companies $7M for Violating Cyber Disclosure Rules
- FinCEN Issues Additional Guidance for Reporting Companies on Dissolved Entities
- Division of Corporation Finance Director Statement: The State of Disclosure Review
- FinCEN Issues Additional Guidance for HOAs and Trusts under the Corporate Transparency Act
- SEC Wins ‘Shadow Insider Trading’ Trial
- SEC Voluntarily Stays Climate Rules
- New SEC Climate Disclosure Rules – Temporarily Stayed
- Corporate Transparency Act Ruled Unconstitutional