On October 18, 2010, the SEC released proposed rules on "Shareholder Approval of Executive Compensation and Golden Parachute Compensation" which address three separate shareholder votes mandated by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act for annual meetings of shareholders conducted on or after January 21, 2011.
Yesterday, the SEC decided to stay the effectiveness of the proxy access rules pending resolution of a petition for review filed in connection with this lawsuit filed by the Business Rountable and U.S. Chamber of Commerce. As a result, proxy access will not take effect in 2010 and its potential applicability to the 2011 proxy season is in limbo.
The Business Roundtable and U.S. Chamber of Commerce have filed a lawsuit in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit to invalidate the SEC’s recently-adopted proxy access rules.
This week, the SEC adoped final rules on proxy access which will require companies to provide certain shareholders or shareholder groups the opportunity to nominate candidates for boards of directors and to include information in the company's proxy materials about, and the ability to vote for, these shareholder nominees.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act immediately revised the net worth test for determining whether an individual investor is an “accredited investor” for purposes of Regulation D and Section 4(6) of the Securities Act of 1933. Specifically, as revised, prospective investors can no longer include the value of their primary residence for purposes of satisfying the $1 million net worth test. Historically, many investors have relied on the value of their homes for purposes of qualifying as an accredited investor. This immediately effective provision applies to offerings that are already in progress, including those that have had initial closings.
On July 20, 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued a new Exposure Draft of a proposed Statement, Contingencies (Topic 450), Disclosure of Certain Loss Contingencies. The FASB has proposed various amendments to Topic 450, formerly known as FASB Statement No. 5, in response to investor concerns about the inadequacy of information currently available regarding the likelihood, timing and amount of future cash flows associated with loss contingencies.
The Senate recently passed the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 and, like the House financial reform legislation passed back in December, it has a lot to say on corporate governance and executive compensation.
As part of its recently adopted Final Rules on Proxy Disclosure Enhancements, the SEC added a new Item 5.07 to Form 8-K. Item 5.07 requires a company to report the results of voting at any shareholders meeting within four business days after the meeting at which the vote was held.
As approved by the SEC, the revised rules (more fully described in this SEC Release) basically conform the NYSE corporate governance listing standards to the requirements of Item 407 of Regulation S-K and to Form 8-K by eliminating duplicative disclosure requirements currently included in the NYSE standards and directly incorporating the Item 407 requirements.
On December 16, 2009, the SEC voted to approve final rules on proxy disclosure and solicitation enhancements which had been initially proposed by the SEC in July 2009. As stated in the SEC's adopting release the new rules will be effective February 28, 2010, meaning they will apply to the 2010 proxy season for substantially all calendar year issuers.
Topics/Tags
Select- Securities Law
- SEC
- Cybersecurity and Privacy Law
- Corporate Transparency Act
- Securities Regulation
- Nasdaq
- Corporate Law
- EDGAR
- EDGAR Next
- IRS
- Cybersecurity Regulation
- Tax Planning
- Coronavirus
- Clawback Rules
- SEC Enforcement
- Taxation
- Dodd-Frank
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- Paycheck Protection Program
- JOBS Act
- Corporate Tax
- Corporate Governance
- FAST Act
- Economic Sanctions
- Ohio LLC Act
- Consumer Protection Act
- Proxy Access Rules
- Securities Litigation
- Crowdfunding
- Conflict Minerals
- Cryptocurrency
- Hedging
- Real Estate Law
- Emerging Growth Companies
- Investors
- Pay Ratio Disclosure
- Whistleblower
- Private Offerings
- Intellectual Property
- Technology
- LIBOR
- Opportunity Zone
- Executive Compensation
- Health Care Act
- Accredited Investors
- Sales Tax
- United States Supreme Court
- Online Trading Platforms
- Wall Street Reform
- IPO
- Registration Statement
- Annual Reports
- Family-Controlled Entities
- Gift and Estate Transfers
- Ohio Foreclosure Reform
- Director Compensation
- Board of Directors
- Director Independence
- Total Shareholder Return
- Cyber Insurance
- Data Breach
- Lenders
- Receivership Statute
- Regulation A
- Regulation D
- CDEs
- CDFI Fund
- Community Development Entities
- Community Development Financial Institutions Fund
- Compensation Committee Certification
- Government Shutdown
- New Markets Tax Credit
- NMTC
- NMTC Financing
- Regulation Fair Disclosure
- Social Media
- Marketing
- Benefits
- Healthcare Reform
- Litigation
- Public Company Transition Rules
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Tax Credit
Recent Posts
- Pay vs. Performance and Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules: Will the SEC Retract Rulemaking?
- Corporate Transparency Act Update: FinCEN Eliminates Reporting Obligations for U.S. Companies and U.S. Persons
- Corporate Transparency Act Update: FinCEN Will Not Enforce the CTA Until Interim Rule is Effective
- Corporate Transparency Act Update: Injunction Lifted - Corporate Transparency Act Back in Effect
- Corporate Transparency Act Update: FinCEN Says Reporting Obligations Remain On Hold
- Next Up in 2025: EDGAR Next
- Corporate Transparency Act Update: Supreme Court Stays Nationwide Injunction – CTA Reporting Obligations Back in Effect
- Corporate Transparency Act Updates: Fifth Circuit Vacates the Stay and Preliminary Injunction Reinstated
- Corporate Transparency Act Reporting Deadline Back in Effect; FinCEN Grants Deadline Extension
- Fifth Circuit Nixes Nasdaq Board Diversity Rules