Sad news from Connecticut yesterday as another workplace shooting claimed 9 lives.
I’m not going to suggest that it could have been prevented, and in fact I have my doubts that such incidents can be completely prevented in a free society such as ours. Moreover, it would be inappropriate to second guess the company involved based on news stories that may or may not be complete and accurate. Nevertheless, it is timely to consider what steps employers can take to minimize the risk of workplace violence.
Provide Training to Employees — Most employers have zero tolerance policies regarding workplace violence and threats. Not all employers train employees on spotting warning signs and what to do if a violent incident occurs. Employees should be trained on such issues and should also be encouraged to report incidents and concerns.
Consider Timing and Circumstances of Termination and Discipline Meetings — No one enjoys being disciplined or terminated from a job. Even apart from the potential for violence, it is usually best to schedule unpleasant meetings for times when there are less employees around the workplace. However, you do not want to be alone either. Thus, it is wise to think about the circumstances and timing when you have to deliver bad news to an employee. No, I am not criticizing the Connecticut company for holding their meeting near a shift change. I do not know why the meeting was scheduled when it was, and I am not in a position to second guess them.
Get Help If You Need It — If you are concerned about a threat, don’t go it alone. If your company has a security force, get them involved. If not, do not hesitate to call the local police and ask for a patrol car to be nearby or even on the premises for a meeting. If you think there is a post termination risk, consider asking the police for continued patrols or even hiring private security for a period of time. I once had a client who was so concerned about an ex-employee that they hired a private investigator to follow the individual for the week after his termination and alert them if he came near the workplace. Nothing happened but that doesn’t mean it was a bad decision to take the precaution.
Trust Your Gut — Some years ago, I read a book called “The Gift of Fear and Other Survival Signals that Protect Us From Violence,” by Gavin de Becker.
One of the author’s points is that you should not ignore intuitions about danger. I agree. If your gut tells you something is wrong, don’t automatically dismiss the feeling.
Workplace violence is not going to go away, and it is an issue that needs to be considered as seriously as any other workplace safety issue. OSHA has a wealth of information here. Even more information here.
Feel free to share your comments. You'll find a link to my email at the CONTACT line below.
Topics/Tags
Select- Labor & Employment Law
- Employment Law
- Discrimination
- EEOC
- Department of Justice
- Non-Compete Agreements
- NLRB
- Religion Discrimination
- Title VII
- Department of Labor
- Diversity
- Reasonable Accommodation
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Coronavirus
- NLRA
- Labor Law
- Artificial Intelligence
- Inclusion
- LGBTQ+
- National Labor Relations Board
- Wage & Hour
- Privacy
- FLSA
- Overtime Pay
- Federal Trade Commission
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- FMLA
- Workplace Accommodations
- Arbitration
- Employment Litigation
- Workplace Violence
- Medical Marijuana
- IRS
- Litigation
- Social Media
- Employer Policies
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Disability Discrimination
- Retirement
- National Labor Relations Act
- Accommodation
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Race Discrimination
- OSHA
- Employer Handbook
- ERISA
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- ADAAA
- Whistleblower
- Unions
- United States Supreme Court
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Employer Rules
- Sexual Harassment
- Technology
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Transgender Issues
- Disability
- 401(k)
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Sixth Circuit
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Benefits
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Securities Law
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Health Savings Account
- SECURE Act
- Environmental Law
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Privacy Laws
- Representative Election Regulations
- Healthcare Reform
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Affirmative Action
- Compensable Time
- Electronically Stored Information
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Security Screening
- Supreme Court
- Telecommuting
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Attendance Policy
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- American Medical Association
- Classification
- Confidentiality
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- Misclassification
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Social Media Content
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Taxation
- Antitrust
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
Recent Posts
- EEOC & DOJ New Guidance on DEI-Related Discrimination: What Does it Mean for Employers?
- EEOC Targets 20 Large Law Firms regarding DEI related Employment Practices
- Ohio Senate Bill 11: Key Provisions and Implications for Employers
- Shifting Burdens: Is McDonnell Douglas Past Its Prime?
- Uncertain Ground: The NLRB, EEOC, and the Fallout of Presidential Firings
- UPDATED: What’s Next for the Department of Labor? The Confirmation of Lori Chávez-DeRemer
- Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion: Where Things Stand in Response to Actions Taken by President Trump
- Recent Executive Orders’ Impact on the EEOC
- NLRB Acting General Counsel Rescinds Numerous Predecessor’s Memoranda
- Federal Court Overturns Expansion of Overtime Requirements