I ran across an interesting debate in a recent issue of the USA Today over the issue of job postings. Apparently, some employers have been posting jobs with a statement that the unemployed need not apply. The USA Today editors argued for (“Let business hire whoever it wants”) and against (“Telling the jobless not to apply is plain dopey”) the practice. Fortunately, the argument against the practice notes the potential for disparate impact lawsuits in excluding the unemployed from consideration for open positions. Earlier this year, the EEOC held hearings on this issue and the recently introduced Fair Employment Act of 2011 (H.R. 1113) would amend Title VII to add “unemployment status” to the list of protected classes. On the state level, New Jersey hastily passed legislation prohibiting statements in job ads that unemployed persons will not be considered. New York has pending legislation that would make it illegal for employers to disqualify out-of-work job-seekers solely because they are unemployed. It seems likely that other states will follow suit.
I have run across job posting issues from time to time in practice and often the employer is surprised by these claims. One reason is that job postings are seldom reviewed by an attorney and often are not even reviewed by a human resources professional. In many cases, hiring managers write postings without having been trained on the legal issues involved. Even worse, many job postings are created by outside recruiting agencies. This means that the employer, who is exposed to liability, may have never reviewed the posting.
Some may scoff at the notion that employers would be so careless with their job postings. This week, I went to my local Craigslist employment section and browsed the job postings. Here are excerpts from some postings that I located (with identifying information removed):
- We are currently looking for a female bartender for a club located in the ________ area. Experience is preferred but we will train the right person. If your interested, please forward photos and a resume to _______.
- We are currently looking for people for a fast paced position we have in the ___________ area. No felonies or misdemeanors involving theft, drugs, violence, or dishonesty will be considered for this position.
- [R]eliability a must as is good transportation. That does NOT mean your girl friend!! I wil [sic] not listen to the plethra [sic] of excuses. I expect one to show up for work each day clear headed and ready to work a 6-8 hour day. hopefully not to [sic] much to ask.
- Must be dependable and willing to work hard. In your response, please tell me your age, where you live and if you have transportation.
- Looking for an energetic, friendly, customer service oriented co manager for a specialty store in mall. Must be goal driven and likes to "win".
While many of the postings I looked at had nothing wrong with them, it took very little time to locate the examples above, all of which could use some editing. If your company does not regularly review job postings for compliance with applicable laws, you may find yourself unpleasantly surprised when the EEOC or a state agency comes calling.
Topics/Tags
Select- Labor & Employment Law
- Department of Labor
- Employment Law
- FLSA
- Overtime Pay
- Discrimination
- Coronavirus
- Non-Compete Agreements
- Labor Law
- Federal Trade Commission
- National Labor Relations Board
- Wage & Hour
- Privacy
- Reasonable Accommodation
- NLRB
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Workplace Accommodations
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- FMLA
- Arbitration
- Employment Litigation
- Workplace Violence
- Religion Discrimination
- Medical Marijuana
- IRS
- Litigation
- Social Media
- Employer Policies
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Disability Discrimination
- Retirement
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- National Labor Relations Act
- Race Discrimination
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Accommodation
- OSHA
- Employer Handbook
- ERISA
- Whistleblower
- EEOC
- United States Supreme Court
- ADAAA
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Unions
- Title VII
- Employer Rules
- Sexual Harassment
- Technology
- Federal Arbitration Act
- NLRA
- Transgender Issues
- Disability
- 401(k)
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Sixth Circuit
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Benefits
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- Securities Law
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Health Savings Account
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Environmental Law
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Privacy Laws
- Representative Election Regulations
- Department of Justice
- Healthcare Reform
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Affirmative Action
- Electronically Stored Information
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Telecommuting
- Compensable Time
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Security Screening
- Supreme Court
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- American Medical Association
- Attendance Policy
- Classification
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Misclassification
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Confidentiality
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Social Media Content
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Taxation
- Antitrust
Recent Posts
- Federal Court Overturns Expansion of Overtime Requirements
- U.S. Supreme Court to Review Title VII Reverse Discrimination Case
- NLRB General Counsel Expands Focus on Non-Compete Agreements and Stay-Or-Pay Agreements
- FTC's Non-Compete Rule Struck Down
- District Court Finds in Favor of FTC, Declines to Issue Injunction
- DOL Increases Compensation Threshold for Exemption Eligibility
- Federal Trade Commission Announces New Rule Invalidating Non-Compete Agreements
- EEOC Announces Final Rule Providing Guidelines under the PWFA
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Immediate Termination
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Labor & Employment Law Update February 2024