Employers received more good news from the U.S. Supreme Court this week with decisions in two cases that toughen standards for determining who is a supervisor and for proving retaliation.
In Vance v. Ball State University, the majority rejected the definition of “supervisor” advanced by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, i.e. someone authorized to take “tangible employment actions” or direct the employee’s daily work activities. Instead, the court ruled that a “supervisor” is limited to someone authorized to take “tangible employment actions” like hiring, firing, promoting, demoting or reassigning employees to significantly different responsibilities. Justice Alito, who wrote the majority opinion, noted that “the ability to direct another employee’s tasks is simply not sufficient” to declare someone a supervisor. The decision is significant because plaintiffs claiming racial or sexual harassment face a lower burden to prove an employer liable when the harassment is committed by a supervisor rather than a co-worker.
In a second employment law decision issued on Monday, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar, the court raised the bar for plaintiffs claiming retaliation. The court held that a plaintiff must prove that the retaliation was not just a motivating factor in an adverse action, but the determinative factor. As a result, courts must now apply a “but for” standard to causation in retaliation claims.
These decisions along with last week’s pro arbitration ruling are the most good news employers have had from the Supreme Court in recent years.
Topics/Tags
Select- Labor & Employment Law
- Employment Law
- Coronavirus
- Labor Law
- Department of Labor
- Wage & Hour
- National Labor Relations Board
- Privacy
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Reasonable Accommodation
- Workplace Accommodations
- NLRB
- FMLA
- Employment Litigation
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- Arbitration
- FLSA
- Non-Compete Agreements
- Workplace Violence
- Religion Discrimination
- Discrimination
- Medical Marijuana
- IRS
- Litigation
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- Social Media
- Employer Policies
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Disability Discrimination
- Whistleblower
- Retirement
- Race Discrimination
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- National Labor Relations Act
- OSHA
- Accommodation
- United States Supreme Court
- Federal Trade Commission
- Employer Handbook
- ERISA
- EEOC
- ADAAA
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Unions
- Title VII
- Employer Rules
- Sexual Harassment
- Technology
- Federal Arbitration Act
- NLRA
- Transgender Issues
- 401(k)
- Disability
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Sixth Circuit
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Benefits
- Securities Law
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Health Savings Account
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Environmental Law
- Privacy Laws
- Overtime Pay
- Representative Election Regulations
- Department of Justice
- Healthcare Reform
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Telecommuting
- Affirmative Action
- Compensable Time
- Electronically Stored Information
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Security Screening
- Supreme Court
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- American Medical Association
- Attendance Policy
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- Classification
- Confidentiality
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- Misclassification
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Social Media Content
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Taxation
- Antitrust
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
Recent Posts
- DOL Increases Compensation Threshold for Exemption Eligibility
- Federal Trade Commission Announces New Rule Invalidating Non-Compete Agreements
- EEOC Announces Final Rule Providing Guidelines under the PWFA
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Immediate Termination
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Labor & Employment Law Update February 2024
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Telephone Game
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Labor & Employment Law Update January 2024
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Employment Law Issues to Watch in 2024
- Department of Labor Announces New Independent Contractor Rule to Go into Effect March 11, 2024
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: The Employment Law Naughty & Nice List