New Rules for Federal Contractors:
On December 3, 2014, the Department of Labor announced a Final Rule changing OFCCP’s regulations so that they prohibit discrimination based on, and require treatment of applicants and employees without regard to, sexual orientation or gender identity. These final rules were issued as a result of President Obama signing an executive order in July, 2014, extending workplace protections to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) Americans in the federal contracting workforce.
The only affirmative action requirements affected by this final rule are those relating to company policies. Contractors satisfy this obligation by including the updated Equal Opportunity Clause in new or modified subcontracts and purchase orders, ensuring that applicants and employees are treated without regard to their sexual orientation and gender identity, and by updating the equal opportunity language used in job solicitations and posting updated notices.
Actions Federal Contractors Must Take Now:
The Equal Opportunity Clause, require contractors to expressly state in solicitations for employees that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. The regulations detail the options available to contractors for complying with this requirement, which range from stating in employment solicitations that ‘‘all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin’’ to simply including the phrase ‘‘an equal opportunity employer.’’ While some contractors include the detailed list, others include the phrase ‘‘equal opportunity employer.’’
Sample Policy: ABC Company is an Equal Employment Opportunity Employer. The policy of ABC Company is to provide equal employment opportunity to all applicants and employees without regard to sex, gender, sexual orientation or gender identity, pregnancy, race, color, age, religion, disability, national origin, military service, veteran status or any other legally protected status. ABC Company complies with all state, federal and local laws regarding employment. This policy applies to all personnel actions including recruitment, selection, hiring, training, compensation, benefits, transfers and promotion.
Federal Contractors should incorporate this same additional language in job solicitations, postings, subcontracts, purchase orders, and any other document that set forth the Equal Employment Opportunity language.
No Changes Required for Affirmative Action Tracking and Data Collection:
This final rule makes no changes to the provisions governing reporting and information collection. The new obligations are separate from the additional affirmative action requirements in the contents of contractors’ written affirmative action programs. No changes are being made to the written affirmative action program requirements, which will continue to be limited to gender, race, and ethnicity. The final rule does not require contractors to set placement goals on the bases of sexual orientation or gender identity, nor does it require contractors to collect and analyze any data on these bases.
Use of Company Facilities by Transgender Employees:
A less publicized change addresses segregated facilities. To comply with its obligations under the Order, a contractor must ensure that facilities provided for employees are provided in such a manner that segregation on the basis sexual orientation and gender identity (as well as all other EO classifications) cannot result. The contractor may neither require such segregated use by written or oral policies nor tolerate such use by employee custom. The term ‘‘facilities’’ includes restrooms, wash rooms, locker rooms, and other dressing areas.
The changing legal landscape requires careful attention when dealing with gender identity and sexual orientation issues in the workplace.
Topics/Tags
Select- Labor & Employment Law
- Employment Law
- Discrimination
- EEOC
- Department of Justice
- Non-Compete Agreements
- NLRB
- Religion Discrimination
- Title VII
- Department of Labor
- Diversity
- Reasonable Accommodation
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Coronavirus
- NLRA
- Labor Law
- Artificial Intelligence
- Inclusion
- LGBTQ+
- National Labor Relations Board
- Wage & Hour
- Privacy
- FLSA
- Overtime Pay
- Federal Trade Commission
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- FMLA
- Workplace Accommodations
- Arbitration
- Employment Litigation
- Workplace Violence
- Medical Marijuana
- IRS
- Litigation
- Social Media
- Employer Policies
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Disability Discrimination
- Retirement
- National Labor Relations Act
- Accommodation
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Race Discrimination
- OSHA
- Employer Handbook
- ERISA
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- ADAAA
- Whistleblower
- Unions
- United States Supreme Court
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Employer Rules
- Sexual Harassment
- Technology
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Transgender Issues
- Disability
- 401(k)
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Sixth Circuit
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Benefits
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Securities Law
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Health Savings Account
- SECURE Act
- Environmental Law
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Privacy Laws
- Representative Election Regulations
- Healthcare Reform
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Affirmative Action
- Compensable Time
- Electronically Stored Information
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Security Screening
- Supreme Court
- Telecommuting
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Attendance Policy
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- American Medical Association
- Classification
- Confidentiality
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- Misclassification
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Social Media Content
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Taxation
- Antitrust
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
Recent Posts
- EEOC & DOJ New Guidance on DEI-Related Discrimination: What Does it Mean for Employers?
- EEOC Targets 20 Large Law Firms regarding DEI related Employment Practices
- Ohio Senate Bill 11: Key Provisions and Implications for Employers
- Shifting Burdens: Is McDonnell Douglas Past Its Prime?
- Uncertain Ground: The NLRB, EEOC, and the Fallout of Presidential Firings
- UPDATED: What’s Next for the Department of Labor? The Confirmation of Lori Chávez-DeRemer
- Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion: Where Things Stand in Response to Actions Taken by President Trump
- Recent Executive Orders’ Impact on the EEOC
- NLRB Acting General Counsel Rescinds Numerous Predecessor’s Memoranda
- Federal Court Overturns Expansion of Overtime Requirements