Here is a scenario I’ve seen too many times to count. An employee is terminated and files a lawsuit. The employer had a good reason but there are counter arguments. For example, maybe the employee violated the attendance policy too many times but the employee has excuses or explanations for some of the absences that might have some merit. Upon investigating the facts, I discover that the employee had a long history of workplace issues and shortly before termination had engaged in some truly bad conduct, e.g. stealing or sexually harassing a co-worker. Inexplicably, the employee was given a pass or at least another chance after the truly bad conduct.
This scenario presents multiple problems for the defense of the lawsuit. First, it undermines the legitimate reason for termination and creates the appearance of inconsistency. If the conduct that lead to termination was so bad, why did the employer not terminate the employee for the worse prior conduct? If the employer acknowledges that the decision to terminate was influenced by the prior bad conduct, why was the decision not made immediately after that conduct occurred? The most discouraging part of the scenario is the likelihood that the termination, if it had occurred immediately after the truly bad conduct, would provide a strong defense case with little settlement value compared to the case arising from the later termination. In essence, the employer has chosen to defend a weaker case over a stronger case by waiting to terminate the employee.
Obviously, every situation is different and there may be good reasons to try to rehabilitate an employee with workplace issues. However, employers should consider their options and not hesitate to act decisively when given the opportunity. Always keep in mind one of the primary rules of employment law: No good deed goes unpunished.
Topics/Tags
Select- Labor & Employment Law
- Employment Law
- Discrimination
- EEOC
- Non-Compete Agreements
- NLRB
- Religion Discrimination
- Title VII
- Department of Justice
- Department of Labor
- Reasonable Accommodation
- Diversity
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Coronavirus
- NLRA
- Labor Law
- Artificial Intelligence
- Inclusion
- LGBTQ+
- National Labor Relations Board
- Wage & Hour
- Privacy
- FLSA
- Overtime Pay
- Federal Trade Commission
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- FMLA
- Arbitration
- Workplace Accommodations
- Employment Litigation
- Workplace Violence
- Medical Marijuana
- IRS
- Litigation
- Social Media
- Employer Policies
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Disability Discrimination
- Retirement
- National Labor Relations Act
- Accommodation
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Race Discrimination
- OSHA
- Employer Handbook
- ERISA
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- ADAAA
- Whistleblower
- Unions
- United States Supreme Court
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Employer Rules
- Sexual Harassment
- Technology
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Transgender Issues
- Disability
- 401(k)
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Sixth Circuit
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Benefits
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Securities Law
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Health Savings Account
- SECURE Act
- Environmental Law
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Privacy Laws
- Representative Election Regulations
- Healthcare Reform
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Affirmative Action
- Compensable Time
- Electronically Stored Information
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Security Screening
- Supreme Court
- Telecommuting
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Attendance Policy
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- American Medical Association
- Classification
- Confidentiality
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- Misclassification
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Social Media Content
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Taxation
- Antitrust
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
Recent Posts
- EEOC & DOJ New Guidance on DEI-Related Discrimination: What Does it Mean for Employers?
- EEOC Targets 20 Large Law Firms regarding DEI related Employment Practices
- Ohio Senate Bill 11: Key Provisions and Implications for Employers
- Shifting Burdens: Is McDonnell Douglas Past Its Prime?
- Uncertain Ground: The NLRB, EEOC, and the Fallout of Presidential Firings
- UPDATED: What’s Next for the Department of Labor? The Confirmation of Lori Chávez-DeRemer
- Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion: Where Things Stand in Response to Actions Taken by President Trump
- Recent Executive Orders’ Impact on the EEOC
- NLRB Acting General Counsel Rescinds Numerous Predecessor’s Memoranda
- Federal Court Overturns Expansion of Overtime Requirements