On October 13, 2022, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) to modify Wage and Hour Division regulations to revise its analysis for determining employee or independent contractor classification under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Over the past decades, the DOL and courts have applied an economic reality test to determine whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor under the FLSA. Although factors examined under this test varied across circuits, the ultimate question under this analysis is whether, as a matter of economic reality, the worker is either economically dependent on the employer for work (and is thus an employee) or is in business for him/herself (and is thus an independent contractor). In January 2021, the DOL reduced the primary factors the agency would consider when determining whether a worker is an independent contractor or an employee to two “core factors”, namely, the nature and degree of control over the work and the worker’s opportunity for profit or loss based on investment. These two factors under the 2021 rule are the most probative and carry greater weight in the analysis.
The DOL seeks to modify the 2021 “core factors” inquiry under the economic reality test analysis, and instead return to the totality-of-the-circumstances analysis of multiple factors in determining whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor under the FLSA. These factors generally include the opportunity for profit or loss, investment, the degree of permanence of the work relationship, the degree of control by the employer over the worker, whether the work is an integral part of the employer’s business, and the worker’s use of skill and initiative.
The proposed rule will likely tip the scale in favor of classifying more workers as employees, as compared to the current rule. Employers who use independent contractors should carefully analyze the relationship with these workers in light of the six factors in the proposed rule. Workers who are currently classified as independent contractors under the current rule may be misclassified under the proposed rule. Misclassification of workers carries significant risks for employers. If a change to a worker’s classification brings the worker under FLSA’ s protection, an employer could face liability for unpaid wages and overtime, and liquidated damages equal to the amount owed in unpaid wages. Treble damages, which is an amount equal to two times the unpaid wages are possible too. In addition, attorney’s fees and costs may be awarded. Furthermore, misclassification carries other risks, including tax and benefits liabilities, and tort liability to third parties for injuries caused by contractors, if those workers were incorrectly classified.
The DOL has invited interested parties to submit comments regarding the NPRM by December 13, 2022 (the new deadline). For more information, please contact the KMK Law Labor & Employment Law team.
KMK Law articles and blog posts are intended to bring attention to developments in the law and are not intended as legal advice for any particular client or any particular situation. The laws/regulations and interpretations thereof are evolving and subject to change. Although we will attempt to update articles/blog posts for material changes, the article/post may not reflect changes in laws/regulations or guidance issued after the date the article/post was published. Please consult with counsel of your choice regarding any specific questions you may have.
ADVERTISING MATERIAL.
© 2024 Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL. All Rights Reserved
- Associate
Mianda Bashala is an associate in the firm’s Labor & Employment Group where she helps clients meet their business objectives and minimize liability through the effective application of labor and employment laws. Her practice ...
Topics/Tags
Select- Labor & Employment Law
- Department of Labor
- FLSA
- Overtime Pay
- Employment Law
- Discrimination
- Coronavirus
- Non-Compete Agreements
- Labor Law
- Federal Trade Commission
- National Labor Relations Board
- Wage & Hour
- Privacy
- Reasonable Accommodation
- NLRB
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Workplace Accommodations
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- FMLA
- Arbitration
- Employment Litigation
- Workplace Violence
- Religion Discrimination
- Medical Marijuana
- IRS
- Litigation
- Social Media
- Employer Policies
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Disability Discrimination
- Retirement
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- National Labor Relations Act
- Race Discrimination
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Accommodation
- OSHA
- Employer Handbook
- ERISA
- Whistleblower
- EEOC
- United States Supreme Court
- ADAAA
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Unions
- Title VII
- Employer Rules
- Sexual Harassment
- Technology
- Federal Arbitration Act
- NLRA
- Transgender Issues
- Disability
- 401(k)
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Sixth Circuit
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Benefits
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- Securities Law
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Health Savings Account
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Environmental Law
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Privacy Laws
- Representative Election Regulations
- Department of Justice
- Healthcare Reform
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Affirmative Action
- Compensable Time
- Electronically Stored Information
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Security Screening
- Supreme Court
- Telecommuting
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- American Medical Association
- Attendance Policy
- Classification
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Misclassification
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Confidentiality
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Social Media Content
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Taxation
- Antitrust
Recent Posts
- Federal Court Overturns Expansion of Overtime Requirements
- U.S. Supreme Court to Review Title VII Reverse Discrimination Case
- NLRB General Counsel Expands Focus on Non-Compete Agreements and Stay-Or-Pay Agreements
- FTC's Non-Compete Rule Struck Down
- District Court Finds in Favor of FTC, Declines to Issue Injunction
- DOL Increases Compensation Threshold for Exemption Eligibility
- Federal Trade Commission Announces New Rule Invalidating Non-Compete Agreements
- EEOC Announces Final Rule Providing Guidelines under the PWFA
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Immediate Termination
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Labor & Employment Law Update February 2024