Here is a hypothetical attorney-client interaction:
Client: I called because we are planning to eliminate a couple of positions. We have decided which positions to eliminate and want to move forward as soon as possible.
Attorney: I’m happy to help. Let’s discuss your decision making process, who has been selected for elimination and what needs to be done next.
Client: Actually, I was hoping you could just send over some form severance agreements and maybe a checklist of things we need to do in this kind of situation.
I bet this sounds familiar. I’ve had conversations like this many times and they can be stressful for a couple of reasons. First, if the attorney resists the request, the client may think he or she just wants to charge time for filling in forms; a charge that could be easily avoided by letting the client do it. Second, if the attorney agrees and hands over form documents, there is always the concern that the client will not use them properly or fail to spot the issues not covered by a standard form or checklist.
Based on the second concern, I think that using forms without consultation or analysis is almost always a bad idea. This goes for attorneys as well as clients. Some attorneys, especially inexperienced attorneys, rely too heavily on form documents. Clients looking to save on legal fees often engage in the above conversation with their attorneys or worse yet, recycle old documents or find forms on the internet. The problem with all of these approaches is that there is no substitute for actually analyzing a situation to spot and manage the issues.
I am not suggesting that forms and checklists should never be used, nor am I advocating for attorneys charging clients to reinvent the wheel every time they address an issue. Using forms and checklists can save the client time and money on the finished product but they can never be a substitute for sound legal analysis. Blindly relying on forms is a recipe for disaster that can expose an employer to liability well beyond the legal fees supposedly saved by skipping a consultation with an attorney.
Let me know if you agree. You'll find a link to my email at the CONTACT line below.
Topics/Tags
Select- Labor & Employment Law
- Employment Law
- Workplace Violence
- Discrimination
- EEOC
- NLRB
- Department of Labor
- Non-Compete Agreements
- Religion Discrimination
- Title VII
- Reasonable Accommodation
- Coronavirus
- Department of Justice
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Diversity
- NLRA
- Labor Law
- Artificial Intelligence
- Inclusion
- LGBTQ+
- National Labor Relations Board
- Wage & Hour
- Privacy
- FLSA
- Overtime Pay
- Federal Trade Commission
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- FMLA
- Arbitration
- Workplace Accommodations
- Employment Litigation
- Medical Marijuana
- IRS
- Litigation
- Social Media
- Employer Policies
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Disability Discrimination
- Retirement
- National Labor Relations Act
- Accommodation
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Race Discrimination
- OSHA
- Employer Handbook
- ERISA
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- ADAAA
- Whistleblower
- Unions
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- United States Supreme Court
- Employer Rules
- Sexual Harassment
- Technology
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Transgender Issues
- Disability
- 401(k)
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Sixth Circuit
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Benefits
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Securities Law
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Health Savings Account
- Environmental Law
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Privacy Laws
- Representative Election Regulations
- Healthcare Reform
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Affirmative Action
- Electronically Stored Information
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Telecommuting
- Compensable Time
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Security Screening
- Supreme Court
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- American Medical Association
- Attendance Policy
- Classification
- Confidentiality
- Equal Pay
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- Misclassification
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Disability Leave
- Social Media Content
- Taxation
- Antitrust
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
Recent Posts
- Workplace Violence: Are You Taking Required Steps to Protect Your Employees?
- EEOC & DOJ New Guidance on DEI-Related Discrimination: What Does it Mean for Employers?
- EEOC Targets 20 Large Law Firms regarding DEI related Employment Practices
- Ohio Senate Bill 11: Key Provisions and Implications for Employers
- Shifting Burdens: Is McDonnell Douglas Past Its Prime?
- Uncertain Ground: The NLRB, EEOC, and the Fallout of Presidential Firings
- UPDATED: What’s Next for the Department of Labor? The Confirmation of Lori Chávez-DeRemer
- Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion: Where Things Stand in Response to Actions Taken by President Trump
- Recent Executive Orders’ Impact on the EEOC
- NLRB Acting General Counsel Rescinds Numerous Predecessor’s Memoranda