Last week, President Trump’s nominee for Secretary of Labor, former Oregon Congresswoman Lori Chávez-DeRemer, appeared before the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions for her confirmation hearing. Her nomination was something of a surprise as Chávez-DeRemer, the daughter of a lifelong Teamster, was known for taking more union-leaning stances during her short stint in Congress. For example, as a member of the House, Chávez-DeRemer was one of three Republicans to support the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act. The PRO Act sought to expand labor protections and weaken “right-to-work” laws, which allow employees to opt-out of participation in or paying dues to unions that represent workers at their place of employment.
During the hearing, Chávez-DeRemer seemed to downplay some of her previous stances and expressed her willingness to adhere to President Trump’s labor agenda. Indicating that her previous positions were a reflection on her commitments to her constituents in Oregon, she committed herself to President Trump’s policy vision when pressed about her support of the more union-leaning stances the Department of Labor took during the Biden Administration. Although maintaining some support for the PRO Act, Chávez-DeRemer clarified that she would not support the Act when in conflict with right-to-work laws. Throughout the hearing, it became clear that Chávez-DeRemer’s stance on labor issues will reflect the goals of the Trump Administration.
What does this mean for employers? As this blog has previously covered, agencies such as the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) have already been actively rescinding guidance issued during the Biden Administration regarding topics such as the enforceability of non-compete agreements and specific protections for LGBTQ+ workers. Should Chávez-DeRemer be confirmed, employers can expect her to continue carrying out the current administration’s labor agenda. Under Chávez-DeRemer’s leadership, the DOL will likely focus on establishing guidance pertaining to the independent contractor classification rule and exploring strategies to modernize federal labor laws to aid business growth and workforce development. Nevertheless, her nomination suggests a potential evolution from the first Trump administration’s attitude towards union issues.
Given the pace already set by the Trump Administration, employers should expect continued development in federal interpretation of labor and employment law. How Chávez-DeRemer’s priorities fit within those interpretations remains to be seen. However, the KMK Labor & Employment team will continue to monitor new developments and is ready to assist employers as they navigate the changing labor landscape.
KMK Law articles and blog posts are intended to bring attention to developments in the law and are not intended as legal advice for any particular client or any particular situation. The laws/regulations and interpretations thereof are evolving and subject to change. Although we will attempt to update articles/blog posts for material changes, the article/post may not reflect changes in laws/regulations or guidance issued after the date the article/post was published. Please consult with counsel of your choice regarding any specific questions you may have.
ADVERTISING MATERIAL.
© 2025 Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL. All Rights Reserved
- Partner
Greg Robinson assists his clients in navigating the complex world of workplace laws and regulations. He has counseled clients on a wide array of employment matters, including wage and hour disputes, discrimination charges ...
- Associate
Kelzé Riley is an associate in the firm's Labor & Employment Group. Her practice includes a wide range of labor and employment matters.
Kelzé earned her J.D. from the University of Cincinnati College of Law in 2024. While in law ...
Topics/Tags
Select- Labor & Employment Law
- Department of Labor
- NLRB
- EEOC
- Discrimination
- Reasonable Accommodation
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Non-Compete Agreements
- NLRA
- Artificial Intelligence
- Diversity
- Inclusion
- LGBTQ+
- Employment Law
- Coronavirus
- Labor Law
- National Labor Relations Board
- Wage & Hour
- FLSA
- Overtime Pay
- Privacy
- Federal Trade Commission
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- FMLA
- Workplace Accommodations
- Arbitration
- Employment Litigation
- Workplace Violence
- Religion Discrimination
- Medical Marijuana
- IRS
- Litigation
- Social Media
- Employer Policies
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Disability Discrimination
- Retirement
- National Labor Relations Act
- Accommodation
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Race Discrimination
- OSHA
- Employer Handbook
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- ERISA
- ADAAA
- Whistleblower
- United States Supreme Court
- Unions
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Employer Rules
- Title VII
- Sexual Harassment
- Technology
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Transgender Issues
- Disability
- 401(k)
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Sixth Circuit
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Benefits
- Class Action Litigation
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- Disability Law
- Securities Law
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Health Savings Account
- Environmental Law
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Privacy Laws
- Representative Election Regulations
- Department of Justice
- Healthcare Reform
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Telecommuting
- Affirmative Action
- Compensable Time
- Electronically Stored Information
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Security Screening
- Supreme Court
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Attendance Policy
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- American Medical Association
- Classification
- Confidentiality
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- Misclassification
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Social Media Content
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Taxation
- Antitrust
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
Recent Posts
- What’s Next for the Department of Labor? The Confirmation of Lori Chávez-DeRemer
- Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion: Where Things Stand in Response to Actions Taken by President Trump
- Recent Executive Orders’ Impact on the EEOC
- NLRB Acting General Counsel Rescinds Numerous Predecessor’s Memoranda
- Federal Court Overturns Expansion of Overtime Requirements
- U.S. Supreme Court to Review Title VII Reverse Discrimination Case
- NLRB General Counsel Expands Focus on Non-Compete Agreements and Stay-Or-Pay Agreements
- FTC's Non-Compete Rule Struck Down
- District Court Finds in Favor of FTC, Declines to Issue Injunction
- DOL Increases Compensation Threshold for Exemption Eligibility